Talk:Sitaram Verma

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 December 2023 by reviewer Jamiebuba (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unreviewed

Hey @Sohom Datta: is there any reason for unmarking reviewed articles as unreviewed? If you believe that one or more sources in an article are unreliable, you can simply use tags. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: I know why They marked reviewed article as unreviewed, because do not happy from my 2 nd time request for autopatrollers right, they 5 more article is marked as unreviewed, I think they clearly misuse of their npp right, sorry but It is true and If they want to simple tag but they do not this, so, I support your thoughts,this is not a reason for mark as unreviewed article, who already reviewed by other npp user. This is a kind of Harassment of my. We do not tolerate if they more work like this again.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7@DreamRimmer I wanted to come back to come back and do a deeper review and hopefully add some new content (essentially looking at whether or not the {{missing information}} was relevant to these articles). I agree that unreviewing these articles was probably not the best idea in this case and I should have just used the {{unreliable sources}} tag and let it at that and made a mental note to come back. I will keep this in mind when marking pages as unreviewed in the future. Sorry for the inconvenience :(

Also just for the record, this has no relation with any unhappiness with your autopatrolled user-right. I am not harrasing you, these articles just caught my eye while looking at your autopatrolled userright request and I decided to take a deeper look at them, since articles in the overarching India topic area are interesting to me. Sohom (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I always appreciate your contributions. As a reviewer, we evaluate other users' work, and unmarking a well-sourced article that has been reviewed can be distracting to the creator. So, I thought I would suggest using tags instead. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, definitely, I had not thought about this from the point-of-view of the unreviewed article checkbox sending a notification to the article creator. I will keep that in mind when reviewing (and/or unreviewing) further articles. :) Sohom (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]