This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
A fact from Sir John Rogerson's Quay appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.
Per WP:MERGEREASON, it is often appropriate to merge "if a page is very short" (this is a one-liner) and "unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time" (it's been a one-liner for nearly 10 years) it "often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic" (there is a broader topic article covering Dublin quays which offers the reader more context and value than this near DICDEF one-liner). Unless there are (further?) objections, I'm inclined to merge/redirect to Dublin quays. (If it hasn't been expanded into a standalone article in the past decade, one wonders whether that is likely to change. If significant content is added later, it can always be restored....) Guliolopez (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Any thoughts on this? I might take a look at expanding myself in the coming weeks. If I am unable to eexpand this beyond one or two sentences, then I'll go ahead with the merge myself. Guliolopez (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved OK. I didn't hear from anyone else, so went ahead. Per my comment, (despite nothing else happening in the past decade or so), I found enough cited content myself to expand this beyond a one-liner stub. And hence, rather than merging, I've expanded enough so that it can "stand alone". I've removed the {merge} tag (added by myself) as a result. Guliolopez (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved OK. I didn't hear from anyone else, so went ahead. Per my comment, (despite nothing else happening in the past decade or so), I found enough cited content myself to expand this beyond a one-liner stub. And hence, rather than merging, I've expanded enough so that it can "stand alone". I've removed the {merge} tag (added by myself) as a result. Guliolopez (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)