Talk:Siphonophora (millipede)

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Requested move 17 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below; a disambiguation page can be created if necessary. Dekimasuよ! 05:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siphonophora (genus) → Siphonophora – This page is a senior synonym and should have the name without a qualifier. YorkshireExpat (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 08:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, @YorkshireExpat:; the cnidarian order Siphonophora was published 8 years before the millipede genus. While priority doesn't apply to ranks above family anyway, but the millipede genus isn't senior. Is there another genus named Siphonophora to be accounted for? At the moment, most incoming links to Siphonophora intend the cnidarian order, but I've just revised {{Siphonophorae-stub}}, which was producing many of the links. Waiting to see what happens to incoming links once the ones through the stub template resolve, but I'm thinking a dab page at Siphonophora may be the best outcome for that title (whether (genus) is the best dab term for the millipede is another issue). Plantdrew (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantdrew I did wonder why the name wasn't preoccupied. The millipede should at least have a hatnote to the cnidarians, and yes, shouldn't be (genus) at the end. YorkshireExpat (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Arthropods has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 08:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all 14 of the current article-space incoming links to Siphonophora intend the cnidarian order. And although taxonomy databases such as WoRMS and ITIS use the spelling Siphonophorae for the cnidarians, many recent scientific articles on the cnidarians use the Siphonophora spelling. I think a disambiguation page for Siphonophora is warranted, but the millipede genus is not the primary topic of the term. Plantdrew (talk)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.