Talk:Sioux City metropolitan area

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Oppose per my reasoning at Tallahassee, Pensacola, Clarksville, and Dayton. To repeat, there are no related articles for other Sioux City's so "Iowa" is unnecessary for disambiguation. There are no style reasons demanding the extra verbiage and plenty of articles use the current form. The current title appears to be more common on Google Books[1] than the proposed.[2]--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: The preferred article title for metropolitan areas is the article title of the principal city with the lower-case words " metropolitan area" appended. Please see the List of metropolitan areas of the United States. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:54, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. All these different move requests and their current connectedness are getting very confusing, but I Oppose this particular one as Sioux City is unambiguous. Zarcadia (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mobile metropolitan area which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]