Talk:Sinusoidal model

Very narrow article

This article seems to have miniscule scope, such that the topic may not be notable. And the NIST doc that it is based on [1] is pretty flaky, using nonstandard frequency terminology (using omega, which already means radians per second or per sample, as if it meant cycles per observation). And that doc's comment of "spectral plot" is also narrow and non-standard, seems to me. Shouldn't this special case be folded into other articles where it fits better, and sourced to something more reliable? Dicklyon (talk) 06:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would not oppose merging into another article or finding better sources. Btyner (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]