Talk:Sinthgunt

Sinthgunt has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 7, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 15, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Germanic pagan Merseburg Incantation, Sinthgunt and the personified sun, Sunna, are sisters using charms to heal a wounded horse?

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sinthgunt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Another very nice article! I can find no problems with it, so I am passing the article to GA status. If you have any questions, drop me a note here or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I enjoyed writing it, and I am glad you enjoyed reading it. :} :bloodofox: (talk) 03:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions

Hello Dbachmann, this is in regard to recent changes to this article. So that it retains its status, please edit this article in accordance to Wikipedia:Good article criteria and please continue to use the referencing system already in place. As for the "abysmal weaseling", I don't know what you're referring to; "theories have been proposed" is perfectly acceptable when the source is a specialized encyclopedia. This isn't weaseling. Some of the older rewrites had less access to scholarship, but they generally all attempt to identify major modern currents in scholarship. This is unlike the German entires, which are usually far, far worse by any standard, and are frequently stuck in the hyper skepticism of the Bugge-Mogk vacuum. Thank you. :bloodofox: (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sinthgunt/Sinhtgunt identity

Sinhtgunt is mentioned along with Balder in the Second Merseburg Charm. So it would be natural for her to be his wife ie Nanna. 21 November 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.186.133 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This webpage is about the subject: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Asatru/message/2124?var=1 25 November 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.186.133 (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than scouring Norse texts for an equivalent, could I suggest she is actually the same as Eostre? This goddess seems to be West Germanic-only, and the dawn goddess would fit well with a name meaning "night-battler" and with being the sun's sister; which the Indo European dawn goddess usually is. Walshie79 (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]