Talk:Simulated phishing
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Citation Needed.
[edit]Regarding this passage: "If such a technique is used carelessly, it may breach laws, attract lawsuits, and antagonise or traumatise staff. However, if employees are advised of a change to policy such that "the company reserves the right to send deceptive 'simulated phishing' email to staff from time to time to gauge staff security awareness and compliance", and training and guidance has been given in advance, then such problems should not occur." What is the source for the claim that antagonizing the staff should not occur if they've been trained in advance? Because it's not true (my colleagues & I are very much antagonized by the time wasted by these simulations despite having been trained in advance and never falling for them), so I'd like to investigate the methodology used to reach that conclusion. ~ CaptHayfever (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete very quickly! No encyclopaedic article, no relevance. In the German Wikipedia, a translation of this article led to its deletion for the reason "Not an encyclopaedic article". Lucky-wikipdia (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)