Talk:Simpson Safari/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 16:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Been rewatching the earlier seasons of this. Need to go out and buy some of the early DVDs I'm missing.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Prose seems grand. Could maybe do with a rewrite of the plot summary in the lead, though - you recap only the first act, and in maybe a bit much detail. Trim that and add something about the rest of the episode maybe?

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
MOS is grand.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
No problems with citations or how they're used.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Scope seems fine, not too broad or narrow.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Article is neutral.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
History is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
N/A - However, free images exist of show writer John Swartzwelder (File:John Swartzwelder Retouched.png) and guest voice Tress MacNeille (File:Tressmacneille.jpg) if either of those seems appropriate to you. I'll not hold this back for lack of an image, but there's some options if you'd like.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Overall I'm going to pass this one. None of the issues are major, and although I do feel the lead needs a slight tweak as mentioned above, that's not something that's actually wrong with the article. The images are also entirely optional so their inclusion or not won't affect things. Well done! GRAPPLE X 16:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]