Talk:Simon & Schuster/Archives/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Simon & Schuster. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
I guess it should be Simon & Schuster all the way through, shouldn't it? That's what they actually call themselves. There was a long discussion in the TIME magazine article about whether it should be TIME, Time, Time Magazine, or whatever, and evidently it's decided that it should be TIME because that's what the mag itself calls itself. So I think it ought to be the same for S&S.... In any case, I don't think it should be both formats in the same article. Hayford Peirce 17:16, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)