Talk:Simba/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

So far, this article looks good, but there are a slight

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Everything looks good, but please file a request with WP:GOCE for copyediting. It doesn't matter if they don't get to it in time for this GA Review, just another helpful step in the quality improvement process. Also, you may want to post to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, asking for help from copyeditors.
Done. Requested copy-editing from WP:GOCE.--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Please go through and make sure citations are all formatted with information filling out fields from citation templates using WP:CIT, make sure no cites are just a bare link and a title and also go through and make sure cites verify WP:V. All cites should be reviewed per WP:RS standards. All dead citations should be replaced.
Done. Article is completely void of dead links; references follow citations format all available fields.--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit wars within the last couple of weeks, looks pretty stable to me.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Fair use rationales are
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
This article looks good so far and I will wait a few weeks or so before I can pass or fail it.
All items listed above have been taken into consideration and corrected. Thank you.--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:44, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article satisfies the GA criteria, and I am going to make this a pass. Well done! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]