Talk:Silvertown explosion

A fact from Silvertown explosion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1917 Silvertown explosion may have been the largest explosion to ever occur in London?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/August.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 19, 2010, January 19, 2011, January 19, 2012, January 19, 2014, and January 19, 2015.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations

London had a number of different boundaries which rarely coincided. London County Council was set up in 1888, its boundaries enclose what are now the Inner London boroughs, and what was the Inner London Education Authority in the days of the Greater London Council. The Metropolitan Police District was set up by statute. Its area was wider than the old LCC, but it did/does not match the GLC area. The London postal districts covered the LCC and beyond, which included parts of Surrey, Kent, Essex and Middlesex. The London postal districts are numbered in the alphabetical order of the post offices, much of the built-up area of the East End was in the County of Essex, but with a London postal address - Walthamstow (E17) is another example.

The outermost boundary of the LCC in the East was the River Lea/Lee. West Ham (and further out East Ham) were County Boroughs of Essex (East Ham since 1915) and official records up to 1965 are held at the Essex Record Office. Some pedants insist that, since the term East End refers to the East End of London, areas that were outside the London boundaries are not entitled to be termed the East End. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.226.49.232 (talk) 12:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sulphurous Yellow"

The end of the article mentions a character from "Upstairs Downstairs" as having "her face is covered in a sulfurous yellow residue.". I have not seen the relevant programme, but it is more likely that the skin discolouring is a result of working with TNT than the explosion itself ~ the girls were commonly nicknamed "Canaries" for this reason. -- अनाम गुमनाम 15:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Canaries was the nickname for the girls whose skin went yellow handling sulphru, but they were nothing to do with this Explosion, they worked at Bryant & Mays Match factory at Bow, north of Silvertown, in an earlier period. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.238.55 (talk) 16:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sunshine

I was an apprentice working in Docklands, 1961-1966 and several of the older employees remembered the great explosion. They seemed unanimous that the explosion had been caused by "bright sunshine shining through a window".

This may be folklaw but I thought it worth a mention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.199.154 (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

canaries

My late mother worked in a Coventry ordnance factory and mentioned that she turned yellow from working with the explosives. She never mentioned the supposed nickname "canaries" though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.199.154 (talk) 09:39, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silvertown-wreckage.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Silvertown-wreckage.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Silvertown-wreckage.jpeg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Development

Having remained empty since the explosion, the site is now undergoing redevelopment, I believe this may be part of the Silvertown Quays development but I'm unable to find a news story that confirms this.[1] Mighty Antar (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Silvertown explosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927122816/http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/sivex.htm to http://www.lalamy.demon.co.uk/sivex.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

should be tagged with related article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_transport_or_storage_of_ammunition 104.169.41.8 (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]