Talk:Silver Strand bikeway

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge this article or delete it

This article falls short of Wikipedia standards in a number of ways. Wikipedia is not a travel guide, WP:NOTTRAVEL. Wikipedia is not for advertising. Wikipedia is not for how-to lists.

My own impulse is to first salvage the worthwhile bits by putting them into the articles Coronado, California and Silver Strand (San Diego), and then either to blank the page and make it into a redirect, or to nominate it for deletion. However, I am not familiar with the standards here governing bicycling and bikeways. So I am posting this comment in hopes that someone who does know those things, maybe someone from WikiProject Cycling, will offer their opinions on whether to salvage this article or remove it. --MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that there are standards for bikeways. This article looks like it has completely no bits that should be saved. I would just try to have it removed.--EdgeNavidad (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stubbified

Content that was in copyright violation has been removed from the article. This has effectively stubbified the article. That said, sources exist from which the article can be expanded. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]