Jump to content

Talk:Silver Knight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.hack//Legend of the Twilight non-canon

[edit]

Where is it stated that the adventures portrayed in .hack//Legend of the Twilight are non-canon?

The manga is canon, the anime isn't. This is simply because the manga fit in the main storyline of .hack, whereas the anime does not.Kazu-kun 05:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Player's Gender

[edit]

Am I totally and grossly mistaken, or wasn't the "real-world" player of the Silver Knight character a woman? Why is this not mentioned? - Tenmiles 17:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're totally mistaken. He was a 23 years-old guy. This was stated by Silver Knight himself in episode 24. Kazu-kun 19:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This whole discussion is about the .hack character Silver Knight. But that Silver Knight does not have his own Wikipedia article; this one is attached to a horse of the same name. Being that Silver Knight (the anime character) may never have his own article, perhaps this whole discussion should disappear; I got to it by clicking on discussion from the horse's article. User: Isk713 18:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't disappear so much as remain with the character or at least with the disambiguation page for Silver Knight, which is what I think [Silver Knight] ought to be. Of the .hack character, the racehorse, and the other uses of the phrase on Wikipedia, none seems to stand out as indisputably the most likely target of any search. If no one objects, I'll move the current text to Silver Knight (horse) and make this a disambiguation page. --Kineticman (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In retrospect I think I should clarify: I propose to move [Silver Knight] to [Silver Knight (horse)], create a disambiguation page at [Silver Knight], and copy this discussion to the new [Talk:Silver Knight] for clarity. --Kineticman (talk) 11:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move done. --Kineticman (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]