Jump to content

Talk:Silly Love Songs (Glee)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I'll be doing the review. I went ahead and fixed a few things; really though, you've done fine work on this article! There are a couple things to work on:

  • In the Production section, please elaborate on this sentence: "In an interview with various reporters at the 2010 Teen Choice Awards, Murphy revealed that he received a mixtape that was sent from Paul McCartney." How did this affect the production of the episode?
I would assume that it cut down the selection of music chosen for the episode. I think this one was original intended to be a tribute to McCartney. DAP388 16:06, 18 March 2011
 Done Taken care of. Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the section Musical performances, are we quoting CNN here?: "CNN gave the music numbers a positive review: "I just loved seeing The Warblers get their groove on amidst the jeans and cotton T-shirts. And Kurt was super gracious trying to be supportive of Blaine, in spite of his own feelings. I also totally loved the music [...] and overall this was one of my favorite episodes this season."". -- Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I put CNN because the writer's name wasn't stated in the article. It can be removed if you want. :) -- DAP388 15:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done All fixed. Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done All done :). DAP388 19:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! I'm going to pass the article to GA :) Kudos! And I'm sure we'll be running into each other for future reviews... I'm a major Gleek! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Silly Love Songs (Glee) passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass