Jump to content

Talk:Silky Sullivan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rationale for "Tone"-tagging

[edit]

While well-written, this article doesn't have an encyclopedic tone at all, but is written like a newspaper/journal article. Large parts are unreferenced, other problems include WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK terms. Wikipedia articles should inform about the subject, not enshrine it. Malc82 (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slang term

[edit]

There should be a discussion of how "Silky Sullivan" has come to be used as a slang term for any come from behind win. —Viriditas | Talk 01:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

Tagged again. The tone of the article is totally unencyclopedic. Very few facts are properly referenced. I'll give it a week or two and then bring out the pruning shears. Tigerboy1966  14:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]