Talk:Silang tanmu

A fact from Silang tanmu appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Chinese play Silang tanmu, which depicts a general returning home to visit his mother, was banned in Tianjin in 1945 because it "distorted the normal ethics and morality"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silang tanmu.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Geardona talk 17:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Chinese play Silang tanmu, which depicts a general returning home to visit his mother, was banned in Tianjin in 1945 because it "distorted the normal ethics and morality"?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Max Stephan

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 16:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Silang tanmu; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review this. This hook is interesting but @Kingoflettuce: Please can you provide a source for this hook in the nomination? Arcahaeoindris (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey there, it's in the article. (I have the hardcopy but should be searchable online.) Don't wish to reproduce any more than what's quoted for copyright reasons. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 11:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't able to find a way to access the source, but accepted in good faith. Passed plagiarism checker, article is well written and neutral. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]