Talk:Signals (Regard and Kwabs song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 08:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• "who wrote it with Kwabs alongside" → "who served as a co-writer with Kwabs,"
• ""Signals" received critical acclaim from" → "The song received critical acclaim from"
• "who praised its music" → "who praised the music"
• Mention the synopsis of the video

Background and composition

• Looks good!

Reception

• "received critical acclaim from" → "was met with critical acclaim from"
• Remove the geographical locations since these introductions are not needed
• "this festive season."" either add the exclamation mark the source uses or move the full-stop to outside the speech marks per MOS:QUOTE
• "declared the song as" → "declared the song as a"
• "and radio hit."" → "and radio hit"."

Music video

• Retitle to Promotion
• "its director, Stephen Agnew, stated "the story of [the" → "its director Stephen Agnew stated: "The story [of the"
• "which display the singer from" → "which display Kwabs from"
• Specify who is lying and dancing

Track listing

• "Signals" – 3:18 → "Signals" (Acoustic) – 3:18

Charts

Weekly charts

• Good

Year-end charts

• Since there is only one position, this should not be sortable

Release history

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks slightly high at 43.2%; cut down quoting from CelebMix to resolve this
• What exactly makes Nieuweplaat a reliable source for ref 8?
• Same query as above for Out Now Magazine on ref 14

• Both removed. Iaof2017 (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 09:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

• Hello @Kyle Peake:, thanks for the review. I've addressed your comments. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, I briefly copy edited but good job and a fast one too! --K. Peake 21:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)