Talk:Signalling Connection Control Part

Unsigned comments from 217.36.0.13

Article contains technical inaccuracies ie: SCCP is defined by the following recommendations :

ITU Q.711 - Q.714, 1992 or ANSI T1.112, 1992 or JT-Q.711 - JT-Q.714, 1992

ANSI T1.112 an JT-Q.711 are modifications to the ITU's specification, which provides the base spec, as stated in the ‘Published specification’ section. JT-Q.711 - JT.Q714 should be added to the list, though. Nevalicori 11:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also the "protocol suite" is inaccurate. ISUP is NOT dependant on the use of SCCP as implied.

It's the stock Wikipedia protocol suite boxout; it's not intended to imply that ISUP requires SCCP, just that ISUP is an example of an Application-layer protocol and SCCP is an example of a Transport-layer protocol, within the context of the SS7 stack. Nevalicori 11:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol Class 4

Anyone know where Protocol Class 4 comes from? There's no mention in latest & greatest ITU-T recommendation (Q.714). Is it an ANSI variant? If so, should be specified as such. Thanks. Carre 15:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the entry for Class 4. The information I have suggests it was originally part of Q.714, but was removed some time ago. ANSI took it on, but may have themselves since removed it (I've not got a copy of the ANSI specs to check). From what I can tell, though, nobody implements it at all. If somebody has a copy of the ANSI specs and it does reference Class 4, they should feel free to put it back in, but until then it's effectively unsourced information and so shouldn't remain. Nevalicori 15:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Name

This protocol is called "Signalling Connection Control Part" with 2 l's and no "and", not "Signaling Connection and Control Part". Could somebody that knows how to rename an article please move it? Dgtsyb 13:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]