Talk:Sign-on and sign-off

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Broadcast engineering and technology task force.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Size is out of all proportion to notability. This is a joke article, right?

Article size is out of all proportion to notability.
Notability of subject not established at all.
Not a single citation.
Needs DELETION or MAJOR TRIMMING.

Given its crazy-big size, and its at-length description of the silliest little (unnotable) details, could this article be a joke?

98.216.249.147 (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call it a "joke article", as it is part of television broadcasting; sure sign-ons and offs are a very niche interest which would explain why it contains a lot of details that a regular reader might not be interested in, but as part of television broadcasting and how other television-related articles such as dayparting have articles, I don't think the topic on sign-ons/offs is irrelevant to wikipedia. -Gouleg (Talk • Contribs) 14:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a niche yet notable subject, because it used to be routine in the days before 24-hour television. --Minoa (talk) 16:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's an important part of television history and is fully worthy of an article on Wikipedia. Rillington (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note to the person who made this

Really interesting stuff, honestly. Thank you got making this, much appriciated! Might work on some more edits on here, cheers. --SukoiW (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]