Talk:Sigeberht of East Anglia/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 14:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Interesting, so I'll take a closer look. BencherliteTalk 14:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Preliminaries:
- No dablinks (well, there was one, which I removed as "Burgundy" had already been linked).
- No broken external links.
Checking against the Good Article criteria:
- Images: three, all with prima facie valid free licensing
- Stable - yes
- Broadness and appropriate focus - looks OK
- Prose and references - I made a few changes as I went through, leaving just these questions / comments / suggestions:
Do we have an approximate year of birth for him in the sources?"William of Malmesbury describes him as his stepson" - I'm a bit lost as to who "him" and "his" are here!"While in Gaul, Sigeberht was converted and baptized and became a very Christian and a very learned man. He was strongly impressed by the religious institutions and schools for the study of reading and writing which he found during his long exile." Could do with a reference, and also avoiding "very... very" if possible.Second half of the first of the paragraphs under "Accession" could do with a reference.Similarly the last sentence of the second "Accession" paragraphSimilarly the second half of the bishopric paragraph."Hereswith and Hild" - should that be "Hilda"? If not, who is Hild?"then the nearest bishopric in Kent to East Anglia." It still is the nearest bishopric in Kent to East Anglia; are you trying to say that it was the nearest bishopric to East Anglia, and it was in Kent?"Cnobheresburg" has a [citation needed] tag."Not long afterwards..." after what?"In this way Sigeberht became a Christian martyr.[23] indicates that the leader of the Mercian assault..." We seem to be missing a word before "indicates"."Penda never accepted Christian teaching and made war against the powers associated with it, seeing himself as the rightful representative of Anglian custom, rule and identity" has a [citation needed] tagIn fact, none of the final paragraph has a source."As a royal martyr, Saint Sigeberht's feast day was observed variously on 29 October" makes me think (1) that if he was not a royal martyr, his feast would not be 29 October, which I don't think is what is meant, and (2) what does "variously" mean in this context?
Sources look good but questions of verifiability / OR will depend on resolving some of the points above.
On hold for the traditional time to allow discussion / resolution of these points. BencherliteTalk 14:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- Do we have an approximate year of birth for him in the sources? no - comment added
- "William of Malmesbury describes him as his stepson" - I'm a bit lost as to who "him" and "his" are here! made clearer
- "While in Gaul, Sigeberht was converted and baptized and became a very Christian and a very learned man. He was strongly impressed by the religious institutions and schools for the study of reading and writing which he found during his long exile." Could do with a reference, and also avoiding "very... very" if possible.Verys sorted; ref added (Plunkett)
- Second half of the first of the paragraphs under "Accession" could do with a reference. ref added
- Similarly the last sentence of the second "Accession" paragraph sentence removed
- Similarly the second half of the bishopric paragraph. ref added
- "Hereswith and Hild" - should that be "Hilda"? If not, who is Hild? alteration made
- "then the nearest bishopric in Kent to East Anglia." It still is the nearest bishopric in Kent to East Anglia; are you trying to say that it was the nearest bishopric to East Anglia, and it was in Kent? strange phrase replaced
- "Cnobheresburg" has a [citation needed] tag. ref added
- "Not long afterwards..." after what? impossible to tell
- "In this way Sigeberht became a Christian martyr.[23] indicates that the leader of the Mercian assault..." We seem to be missing a word before "indicates". Phrase removed
- In fact, none of the final paragraph has a source. Half the paragraph taken out, ref needed for last bit
- "As a royal martyr, Saint Sigeberht's feast day was observed variously on 29 October" makes me think (1) that if he was not a royal martyr, his feast would not be 29 October, which I don't think is what is meant, and (2) what does "variously" mean in this context? Sentence changed to make more sense
- In my search for these references, I found a little more for the article, to be added asap.--Amitchell125 (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK, leave a message here when you're ready for me to take another look. BencherliteTalk 21:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm done, hopefully it's OK now. Thanks for your comments, Bencherlite.--Amitchell125 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Prose is now fine and I'm happy with the quality of the article. MOS:LAYOUT gives the standard order for additional sections, so I've tweaked that (and make one or two minor changes) and will now pass this as a GA. Well done! BencherliteTalk 20:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm done, hopefully it's OK now. Thanks for your comments, Bencherlite.--Amitchell125 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK, leave a message here when you're ready for me to take another look. BencherliteTalk 21:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)