Jump to content

Talk:Siege of Sadr City

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elections

[edit]

I think the article needs to elaborate on what happened in Sadr City in the period between "The Beginning of the Siege..." and "The Sectarian Killings", including how the siege was affected by the elections in December 2005. At the moment, there is no link between September 2004 and November 2006. Lawrencema (talk) 09:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Result

[edit]

I changed the result from "stalemate" to something a bit more descriptive. I don't think that stalemate is quite accurate since the operation did not smiply yield the status quo before the operation. Cook503 (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be pedantic, if I recall correctly (and nothing's saying that I do), there was little fighting in Sadr City before the April 2004 "uprising" and little fighting now, so the status quo was restored by "operation". However, more seriously, the result did need expansion and that is fairly accurate.Lawrencema (talk) 06:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antiwar.com

[edit]

I don't think antiwar.com is the best of sources for an article like this. The news round-ups on Iraq, such as those compiled by Margaret Griffis and used as references on this article, are compiled from other sources. It is far better to use the original sources. Often, there are slight descrepencies, which make this all the more important. And sometimes, the source is third hand, e.g. antiwar.com uses wiredispatch.com for Reuters stories, instead of using the Reuters site. I am going to replace the sources now. BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good idea. No objections here. Lawrencema (talk) 23:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

300 dead?

[edit]

Can we get any proof on this? --66.229.12.186 (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Smoke rises from the Green Zone after a mortar strike March 25, 2008.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Pre Occupation Iraqi Armed Forces'?

[edit]

What does this refer to? Pro-Ba'athist/pro-insurgent remnants of Saddam's army? What ever it is, it should be changed to something more specific. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Siege of Sadr City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siege of Sadr City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siege of Sadr City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Siege_of_Sadr_City&oldid=1199016291"