Talk:Siege of Kazan

File:Qazanqamapalu.GIF Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Qazanqamapalu.GIF, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Qazanqamapalu.GIF) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. (By the way, it's completely okay to say "agree" instead of "support". Contrary to popular belief, these discussions are closed by human editors, not monkeys with typewriters.) Jafeluv (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

---

Siege of Kazan (1552) → Siege of Kazan – Already redirects here, appears to be only siege of Kazan there is. PatGallacher (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Agree. [Edit: I mean Support.] I've just done a Google Books search and this does appear to be the only noteworthy siege of the city. Languagehat (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

• Support - the only potential confusion is with various battles of Kazan but these are adequately covered by a hatnote. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
• Well, technically Kazan was also besieged in 1774 during the Pugachev's Rebellion, but that was a part of a larger battle which we cover in Battle of Kazan (1774), and a simple hatnote takes care of a potential confusion just fine. Support.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 15, 2013; 13:32 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siege of Kazan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003415/http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=S9169 to http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=S9169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Why was the editing canceled with the renaming of Russia to Muscovy?

What are the grounds for calling it the Russo-Kazan war, if in those time Russia itself names as Moscovian state, and was renamed only in 1721? @Mellk please explain your biased and ideological cancellation? Even in the Constantinople Peace Treaty of 1700, in the Slavic language, the people of modern Russia call themselves Moscow people(народ московский), and the state "Moscow State" (Московское государство)? Bodia1406 (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Because this is what the sources say, including in this article. Your original research and fringe theories do not belong here. Mellk (talk) 22:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Show me the original document from the time when modern Russia is called the Russian state? Because even in Russian wikisources I see a document from 1700, where this people call themselves the "Moscow State".

https://ru.m.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80_(1700) Bodia1406 (talk) 22:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOR. Mellk (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Also please refer to WP:HOUNDING. Mellk (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Exactly, that what are you doing against me. WP:HOUNDING Bodia1406 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

What you are doing right now is borderline harassment. Mellk (talk) 23:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Let's discuss the feasibility of adding a campaign box

I see in activity, that one user added this box, but another just deleted it. Let's discus do we need it or not.

Bodia1406 (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)