Talk:Siege of Kőszeg/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:36, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

I correcting some grammatical errors and tweaked some of the wording. As it stands now, the prose and grammar seem good, and the content appears to follow MOS guidelines. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article is well-referenced, and citations are frequently distributed throughout the text. I detected no original research. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 12:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all major aspects of the subject for which reliable information is available. No irrelevant details have been included. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Overall the article's content was neutral, but I tweaked a few words which sounded a bit more conversational than encyclopedic. I see no further issues as such. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

For a war article, its history has been admirably peaceful; most of the editing for the past few months has been done by a single editor; no edits appear to be repeated reverts and restores. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All images used are from the Wikimedia Commons and have valid licenses for being there, so there is no fair use issue. All images have suitable captions, and serve a relevant purpose in the article. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 10:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through Siege of Güns thoroughly and making minor changes, I feel the article now satisfies the GA criteria, and am pleased to add it to the company of War and military GAs. Congratulations! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 12:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Will, thank you very much for your effort, especially on your help regarding the wording (grammar)!--Kebeta (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]