Talk:Siege of Berat (1280–1281)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Magic♪piano 00:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
First paragraph is not cited.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This is a well-written, informative article. I made a minor clarification to the mention of Sicilian Vespers, which not everyone will recognized as some sort of uprising. The sources (as best I can verify) check out, and the images are properly licensed, although the lead map could use an {{Information}} template, properly filled out.
The only issue is that the first paragraph of the background is uncited. I imagine this will not be hard to fix; nomination is on hold. Magic♪piano 13:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review this! I added the requested citations, and tweaked the paragraph around a little. Any further issues? Constantine ✍ 12:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good, passing. Congratulations! Magic♪piano 13:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)