Talk:Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The game showed well at the 1998 E3. What is E3? I tweaked your fix.

Otherwise the prose is reasonably well written.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~Ref #85[2] doesn't metion E3, whatever it is.~~ I am happy that the manual supports this, in good faith.

I assume good faith for off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Meets the criteria
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Captioned and with suitable non-free use rationales.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.
OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Nolelover^{It's almost football season!} 21:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1a: I have add a piped link to Electronic Entertainment Expo, but have kept the "E3". Tell me if you prefer that I expand that.

2a: This one's a little trickier. User:Vyeh was the one who added most of the sources, and he owned the manual, but hasn't been on in months. I removed the link in question, and I can remove the sentence as well, if need be. Your thoughts? Nolelover^{It's almost football season!} 20:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 2a:[reply]