Talk:Sichuan clique

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Casualties

"Data shows all numbers of dead or injured solders (totally 3.26 billions), including 2.24 billions from Sichuan clique. Especially, from 1939 to 1945, the death numbers of solders has 640 millions from Sichuan within total 850 millions[1]. In the Battle of Shanghai, almost all 170 millions Sichuan clique fell in battle, only 2 thousands retreated to Hubei Province."

Really??? 3,260,000,000 casualties??? 170,000,000 in a single battle???

Someone better double-check those numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radoye (talk • contribs) 04:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. Walter Grassroot |talk 09:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced claims

This article has too many unsourced claims, especially in the "World War II" section. The Verified Cactus 100% 20:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]