Talk:Siberia (Lights album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will review this album shortly later. --K. Peake 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but this is being failed already. The article is far from broad in its coverage, with the lack of a music and lyrics section as well as a promotion section. The commercial performance one is only two sentences long; I believe in its current state, the article will not be able to reach GA level of broadness after a week. Also, the prose is poorly written and the entire personnel section is unreferenced. Citations are included in the lead which violations MOS, while the release history section is laid out incorrectly too. Take a look at the good article criteria if you are unsure. --K. Peake 10:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]