Talk:Shwethalyaung Temple

Myanmar Mid‑importance

Shwethalyaung Temple is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi I'm not sure that I am at the right place and doing the right thing - it being my first time. The Shwethalyaung Buddha article states that this statue is the second largest in the world after the one at Dawei/Tavoy. I have two problems with this statement: 1 - what about the Chaukhtatgyi Buddha at Yangon which is 65.83 metres in length? 2 - in your Dawei/Tavoy entry there is no mention of a reclining Buddha.

Hope this helps you. Lonegrouper (talk) 09:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This entry says that Shwethalyaung Buddha is the "second largest in the world," next to another Buddha statue in Dawei/Tavoy. However, as I looked it up through the Internet, I could not find any information about the statue in Dawei/Tavoy, which is claimed to be the "largest" in the world, and thus, even larger than Shwethalyaung Buddha, according to this entry.

In addition, it seems that this entry claims the statue in Dawei/Tavoy to be the largest, mainly based on the fact that Shwethalyaung Buddha is 55m high, while the one in Dawei/Tavoy is 74m high. However, this is quite flawed since the reason why Shwethalyaung Buddha is considered "among the largest" is because of its weight, not because of its length. When it comes to length, Spring Temple Buddha in Lushan, China is the largest/tallest Buddha statue in the world. (it is even the tallest statue in the whole world; 128m high) Yet, Shwethalyaung Buddha, which is never the "tallest," becomes the "largest," nevertheless, since, weight-wise, it is the "heaviest."

Therefore, to claim that the Buddha statue in Dawei/Tavoy is the largest, and larger than Shwethalyaung Buddha, one should prove that it is heavier than Shwethalyaung Buddha, not taller. Yet, this entry only mentions the comparison of heights. This makes me deeply wonder about the validity of the statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandorabox722 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]