Talk:Shumen Plateau Nature Park/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

on the highest plateau "on" is redundant if you refer to Shumen Plateau
- Corrected
Fagus sylvatica subspecies moesiaca Any common name?
- Added
its ancient indigenous forest of the Fagus sylvatica subspecies moesiaca The proper way to write this is "... indigenous Fagus sylvatica moesiaca forest" (also in Geography)
- Added in the lead and Geography section
The paras may be combined
- Done
which is integral to the Operational Program Not sure what "which" refers to here, Republic of Bulgaria or the project or the trail (Also in Trails)
- Clarified

What are the Shumen Heights?
- The article in this reference [1] is titled "An investigation into the flora of the Shumen Heights." It probably means Shuman range of hills. I have put it under quotes.
oriented a the northwest-southeast direction Error or is something missing?
- Corrected
is use of the trails is "the"
- Corrected

The park's management rests You mean the "responsibility of the park's management"?
- Corrected

and its water resources, climate and soil What is "it"? Park or plateau?
- It is the plateau. Corrected in the text
in alphabetical order Redundant, it is understood
- Changed
The mammals species "species" is redundant. Same for "reptile species"
- Corrected
The animal species, which are under different protection categories Weird way to say this, as we have been classifying animals until now.
- Changed

There are many cultural landmarks within the limits of the park or just adjacent to the park. These are: Not really needed
- Changed
(Shumenska krepost) Add "Bulgarian"
- Added

@Nvvchar: Seems Legobot has not notified you about this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this quick review. I do not get any intimation of starting of review or approval of GA. I did not get the ping message also. I have asked for help but the problem is not getting resolved. I saw your review comments just about an hour back and immediately addressed all issues in the article. I hope the corrections are fine. Nvvchar. 15:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]