Talk:Shrimp/Template talk:Shrimp versus prawn
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Shrimp was copied or moved into Template:Shrimp versus prawn with this edit on 16:10, 20 May 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:Shrimp/Template:Shrimp versus prawn was copied or moved into Shrimp with this edit on 12 February 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Plagiarism
[edit]The content of this template has been plagiarised from Prawn and Shrimp. --Epipelagic (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- If it was attributed, then it's allowed, right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, if it is properly attributed. --Epipelagic (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- And McGeddon did not do that, did he? McGeddon, you must go here User:Anna Frodesiak/Pink sandbox, click edit, type that sentence 100 times, then click save. And don't copy paste or I'll know!
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- And McGeddon did not do that, did he? McGeddon, you must go here User:Anna Frodesiak/Pink sandbox, click edit, type that sentence 100 times, then click save. And don't copy paste or I'll know!
- Yes, if it is properly attributed. --Epipelagic (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, fair point, although the edit history does plainly reference a specific talk thread, which is enough to "direct interested parties" to the original source, I could have worded it more scrupulously. I'll put some {{copied}} templates up. --McGeddon (talk) 08:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)