Talk:Shrewsbury–Chester line

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Shrewsbury to Chester Line RDT.

Community rail

Although the Shrewsbury to Chester Line has a Rail Partnership, I don't think it is a designated community railway. I find the community railway scheme very confusing. Can somebody clarify the matter please? Biscuittin (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Track history?

When was the track reduced from double to a single line? The technical needs to be included in articles like this!86.167.190.165 (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chester to Manchester line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No it isn't. It was closed at the end of 2016. Afterbrunel (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chester to Manchester Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious text

Not sure I have ever heard of "Severn-Dee Mainline" ... isn't that a bit whimsical? Wouldn't it be Main Line (two words) anyway? (If two railway enthusiasts met in the pub and called it the "Severn-Dee Mainline" that doesn't make it a notable attribution.

Robert Stephenson was not a contractor for railway construction, and certainly never as someone else's partner. There was another Stevenson who often worked in association with Brassey. I suspect it was him. Can't lay my hands on the data at this moment.

The community rail partnership assertion is not supported by https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/community-rail-lines and the link on the wiki page is broken. Afterbrunel (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page at present states that "Campaigns for both the re-opening of Baschurch Station and Lache Station[citation needed] (near the site of the old Saltney Station) are now under way." The citation does not support the reference to Lache. The Baschurch citation is a basic website quoting a letter to Lord Adonis in 2009. It is a long time since Adonis had any influence over the matter. See also WP:Crystal. Afterbrunel (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV for Wrexham and Shropshire

The article is reasonably balanced about the failure of Wrexham and Shropshire, but it is regrettable that the source cited in support of the text is sensationalist. "You can get off at Wolverhampton but you can’t get on: How crazy rules killed Britain’s last great railway" is not a proper tone for Wikipedia. The rule was imposed to protect the existing franchisee. If that had not been done, then the existing franchisee would have had a legitimate claim against the DfT.

You might or might not think that the franchising system is the right way to manage the railways, but in the environment actually in operation, the rule was appropriate. Whether Wrexham and Shropshire was "Britain's last great railway" is an inappropriate comment. "Britain’s best loved railway company"? "bringing to an end ... an era of gracious rail travel extending back almost 150 years."?

A more maturely phrased citation would be better. Afterbrunel (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]