Talk:Shopping Spree (disambiguation)
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) on 18 May 2022. |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
On 26 May 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Shopping spree to Shopping Spree (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 26 May 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Primary topic status of spree shopping is uncontested. Opposition is not compelling; they are mainly trying to discount spree shopping from consideration by citing WP:NOTDICT, but it doesn't seem to be relevant because that policy is about article content, not primary topics. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Shopping spree → Shopping Spree (disambiguation) – I propose that the clear primary topic of Shopping spree at this capitalization is the activity now noted at Shopping#Spree shopping. All other senses on the page are capitalized. BD2412 T 03:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NOTDICT. Shopping#Spree shopping is barely more than a DICDEF. While spree shopping may be the primary web search topic, Wikipedia is not a compendium of web results or a dictionary. (And I'm not a fan of WP:DIFFCAPS, policy or not, so feel free to ignore me on that basis.) — AjaxSmack 02:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- I think this is a misapplication of NOTDICT, which is about articles, not about sections or redirects to them. Andrewa (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per AjaxSmack. Dicklyon (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Nom makes a clear case IMO. Andrewa (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.