Talk:Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Non-free use rationales for both images are in great shape.
• Additionally, I couldn't find any issues in the infobox.
• Add a comma after "July 3, 2020" per WP:DATECOMMA.

Background and recording

• The last sentence in the first paragraph needs a source.
• That's about it here, #Recording looks great.

Music and lyrics

• This has to be the best-sourced section ever created! Well done.
• "song which features" → "song that features"
• "are sentimental" → "are a sentimental"
• "obsessesing" → "obsessing"
• "with bonus track" → "with the bonus track"

Title and artwork

• In the quote blocks, move the references after Complex.

Release and promotion

• Some sentences here have 3-4 sources. I recommend using WP:CITEBUNDLEs to reduce the clutter.
• "the albums second single" → "the album's second single"
• Since the sentence is kinda short, remove the comma after "relationship".

Critical reception

• Try reducing the use of quotes with the help of WP:RECEPTION.
• In the #Accolades table make the references column unsortable: ! scope="col" class=unsortable | Ref.

Commercial performance and track listing

• Couldn't find any issues in either of these two sections.

Personnel and charts

• These sections look good as well.

Certifications and release history

• Looks good.

References

• Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Some Dude From North Carolina thanks so much for the comments! I have addressed all of your concerns. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)