Jump to content

Talk:Shoot Out at the Fantasy Factory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

The actual title of this is correctly spelled "Shoot out at the fantasy factory," with only the first world capitalized. I reccomend this article be moved to that name. -Litefantastic 00:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same with "The low spark of high heeled boys" as well (if you look at the cover art) but I don't believe it merits a move. <->Fantailfan 01:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)>-<[reply]
No, the titles are correctly spelled "Shoot Out at the Fantasy Factory" and "The Low Spark of High Heeled Boys". The cover art is not the last word on how an album's title is capitalized. See WP: CT.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shoot Out at the Fantasy Factory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Article requirements for:

Green tickY Start-Class criteria:
(1)A reasonably complete infobox. (2) A lead section giving an overview of the album. (3) A track listing. (4) Reference to at least primary personnel by name. (5) Categorization at least by artist and year.

Green tickY C-Class criteria:
(1) All of Start class criteria. (2) A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art. (3) At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section). (4) A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs. (5) A personnel section listing performers, including guest musicians. (6) A casual reader should learn something about the album.

B-Class criteria:

(1) All of B-Class criteria. (2) A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details. (3) A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians. (4) No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. (5) No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow the style guidelines. (6) No glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia.

Last edited at 18:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)