Talk:Shipshape
Nobody uses Wikitionary. Get over it. It is a waste of time to maintain two distinct code bases. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.224.18 (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
2008-05-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit] | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 05:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Expand, merge or redirect
[edit]This page is a dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is not). It explains the meaning, etymology and usage notes of a slang word. I can't find any encyclopedic content on this page. Nothing here rises past what I would expect to read in a truly great unabridged dictionary. The definitions and usage discussions belong over in Wiktionary where folks with the right skills, interests and lexical tools can more easily sort out the meanings and origins.
Options to fix the page here include:
- Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
- Redirect the page to a more general page.
- Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the {{wi}} template).
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 3 for now. The lexical content has already been merged into the Wiktionary page. Rossami (talk) 22:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)