Talk:Shinjuku-gyoemmae Station

Trains: Stations / in Japan Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Trains in Japan.

This article lacks references.

Correct name for article should be "Shinjuku-gyoenmae"

I'm not a wikipedia user but happened upon this article. I am not sure if this is the place but I am recommending/requesting that the article be moved due to incorrect spelling of the title/station.

The correct translation into English is Shinjuku-gyoenmae not Shinjuku-gyoemmae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.56.70.207 (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case any other users want to report this, click this image on the left
to see a picture of the station sign and see that it is listed as Shinjuku-gyoemmae Station and that is the correct Romanization of Japanese for it, if you still lack romaji skills like the above user, you might want to refresh your skills. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need to be condescending. Since you accuse the other IP of lacking knowledge of rōmaji, you surely are aware that "gyoenmae" is revised Hepburn and "gyoemmae" is traditional Hepburn and that both of these systems have their respective strengths and weaknesses: Of course both can be said to be "correct". (Also, since at least a few decades, revised Hepburn is much more common.) What can be said about the latter is, that in this case, it is the official romanization because Japanese railway companies use revised Hepburn with the exception of using "m" instead of "n" before bilabial plosives and [m]. --185.13.28.163 (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]