Talk:Shine (Gwen Stefani song)/Archive 1
Sheet music
[edit]@Aoba47: Even though I'd love to help you out, at the moment I've been studying for finals so I'll be on and off Wikipedia until Wednesday of this week. Here is a link to some sheet music that may be helpful to you. Cheers! Carbrera (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! Good luck with your finals! Aoba47 (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Fixing the links to GA/PR/FAC
[edit]@Ian Rose: Hello, I was wondering if there was some way to fix the links to the previous GA/PR/FAC. I tried following the pattern of other pages and obviously messed everything. I apologize for the trouble. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps I missed something but the links to the GA/FA/PR reviews above seem to be working. I reverted your addition of the latest FAC review to the Milestones because FACBot is designed to take care of this (among other housekeeping tasks) and I don't want to confuse it... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help and I apologize for any inconvenience. I still have a lot to learn about Wikipedia. :P Best, Aoba47 (talk) 06:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, I thought you meant the review links were wrong, I see now you meant the links to the article snapshots at the time of each review. I've fixed these (they should be done by closing bots, maybe something went weird with them or they were edited subsequently). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! And I apologize again for nominating this article twice even though it was not prepared. Aoba47 (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not at all, I know you tried a peer review before the last one, it's a pity it didn't get comments. I would suggest that after actioning any outstanding points from the latest FAC you again put it up for peer review and invite all who have participated in the previous FACs to comment there. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments and that sounds like a great idea. I appreciate all the comments I received from the past two FACs as it is always great to get constructive criticism. Aoba47 (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Ian Rose: Hello, this is a somewhat random message, but I just wanted to thank you again for your help. I received a lot of helpful criticism and advice from the two users who responded to the FACs for this page, but I decided to stop working on this particular page as I am no longer invested in it. I just wanted to let you know since I do not want to come across as rude or flippant since I do appreciate the contributions from other users to this page. I am satisfied enough with getting to GA status and expanding it to this level. Aoba47 (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough -- thank you for the note, and good luck with your future editing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Ian Rose: Hello, this is a somewhat random message, but I just wanted to thank you again for your help. I received a lot of helpful criticism and advice from the two users who responded to the FACs for this page, but I decided to stop working on this particular page as I am no longer invested in it. I just wanted to let you know since I do not want to come across as rude or flippant since I do appreciate the contributions from other users to this page. I am satisfied enough with getting to GA status and expanding it to this level. Aoba47 (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments and that sounds like a great idea. I appreciate all the comments I received from the past two FACs as it is always great to get constructive criticism. Aoba47 (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not at all, I know you tried a peer review before the last one, it's a pity it didn't get comments. I would suggest that after actioning any outstanding points from the latest FAC you again put it up for peer review and invite all who have participated in the previous FACs to comment there. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! And I apologize again for nominating this article twice even though it was not prepared. Aoba47 (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, I thought you meant the review links were wrong, I see now you meant the links to the article snapshots at the time of each review. I've fixed these (they should be done by closing bots, maybe something went weird with them or they were edited subsequently). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help and I apologize for any inconvenience. I still have a lot to learn about Wikipedia. :P Best, Aoba47 (talk) 06:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)