This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Sienetjo is listed as a Shanqella group, yet it says their skin is of a "yellowish tint" and they are "Hamitic," which is very odd. Shanqella by definition is an Agew word refering to the very dark Nilotic people living on the western Ethiopia borderlands. Which part of this article is wrong (aside from the outdated racial terms)? — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia20:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The way the group is described I think it very likely (but not without doubt) that the EB1911 article refers to a group which is nowadays called Shinasha or Boro. I'm quite sure that the article does not talk about a group in present-day Sudan, as these people never got called Shanqella by anyone. That makes the Shinasha the most likely candidate. For lack of any better option I have now redirected to this entry. Certainly there is no group anywhere in the area which is called Sienetjo by anyone nowadays, so there really shouldn't be an article on this. I hope this is ok with everybody. Landroving Linguist (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]