Talk:Shimane Prefecture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:28, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Prefectures task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Do not delete "Takeshima"

Do not delete "Takeshima" by the explanation. It is OK because the South Korean opinion is also indicated to one clue like the page of "Ulleung County" , don't you?
At the "See also", I can understand that the change of "Liancourt Rocks" to "dokdo".--Dent2000q 05:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree.--Junmai 05:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

we cannot flatly state that dokdo is a part of shimane prefecture when shimane doesn't have ownership, possession, or even access to it, that's just a false statement. dokdo is claimed to be a part of shimane prefecture, so the article should state so. you can delete a mention of dokdo altogether, but not insert a false statement. Appleby 06:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please keep in mind that deliberately replacing the name with a double-redirect one is not a good thing! Thank you, and have a nice day. Deiaemeth 06:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is an insistence of the South Korean point of view. And Ulleung- county's page is written as "including Dokdo" by the South Korean point of view. NPOV in this problem is to use a same expression both Ulleung-county and Shimane-prefecture. "including" or "not including" both pages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Celldea (talk • contribs) 10 June 2006.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shimane Prefecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]