Talk:Shigellosis
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Shigellosis.
|
Introduction
[edit]Perhaps I'm misreading, or there's a deeper explanation, but if 165 million people are affected, then either more than 1 million die, or the mortality rate isn't 10-15%. Or does it cause ten cases of dysentery per person? Either way, the sentence needs to be changed somehow.JustinBlank (talk) 06:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shigellosis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This article says:
"Ten to fifteen (10-15)% of people affected will die. In the developing world, Shigella causes approximately 165 million cases of severe dysentery and more than 1 million deaths each year," 1 million deaths out of 165 million cases = 0.6% Quite different to 10-15% |
Last edited at 07:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 05:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Lancet
[edit]doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8 JFW | T@lk 20:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Better source needed for complications
[edit]In multiple places the article lists serious complications (arthritis, sepsis, seizures, and hemolytic uremic syndrome), but no cited source supports this.
One location cites a CDC article, but the current version of the article does not mention complications. (The 2016 version of the article originally cited did.) The other location does not cite a source.
For such an important fact, a current source should be cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:601:1B00:5390:51CE:2817:9ACB:8787 (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Looking for secondary sources on environmental transmission of Shigella
[edit]I want to include a sentence in the Transmission subsection, something like:
- Shigella can also exist in natural water sources, without prior contamination with fecal matter.
Found some primary sources that suggest it, but no secondary sources.
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC124020/
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8708331
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC202139/
Also, found this secondary source on Acanthamoeba as an environmental host for Shigella. This may relate to what I am trying to say above, although I was going more for "exist free-standing in natural water sources" as opposed to inside an amoeba.
Ylok (talk) 19:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Shigellosis in Great Apes at Jacksonville Zoo.
[edit]I just watched a press conference given by the Jacksonville Zoo (FL, USA) 4 days ago. A Gorilla and 2 Bonobo brothers have died and other Apes are sick. The disease is apparently more severe in Apes other than Sapiens; all three of the deaths, as of 4 days ago, had previous heart disease. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipcWBVR2zuk
This is an opportunity (unfortunately) to expand the article to non-Sapiens animals. Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 21:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)