Talk:Shetkaryacha Asud

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why this article needs to be rewritten

Greetings, fellow Wikipedians. Earlier today I put a "rewrite" tag at the top of this article and I would like to expand a bit on the reasons I mentioned in my edit summary. My concern here is that there is really very little article to speak of. The main body of the article is either chapter headings or the opening lines of the chapters. If this is the case, there is a distinct possibility that this constitutes plagiarism and should be removed immediately. The book was written in Marathi and there is no indication in the article if this is an editor's own translation or the translation of Gail Omvedt, he translator cited in the infobox. Again, if it is the latter, then it probably counts as plagiarism and should be removed immediately. The introduction to the article is a polemic that reads as vigorously held opinion and is anything but encyclopedic. Really, I think the article should be scrapped and started from scratch (something that I personally do not know how to do). So, that's my take on the matter. Anyone else care to opine? Tigercompanion25 (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]