Talk:Sherman Skolnick/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sherman Skolnick. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
I have added a reference to this article. Capitalistroadster 02:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
While im not a member, someone had some vandalism in here and i editted it out
POV much?
This is a piss-poor example of a 'biography'. It reeks of brown-nosing and completely lacks objectivity. Reads like something a Catholic would write about the Pope. --Baltech22 22:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree. The man was a conspiracy nut of the first order. Jhobson1 15:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- With a procrustean, philistine attitude like that, there are no conspiracies, then. Which is another form of nuttery, really. Fact of the matter is, of course the ruling-class conspires against the people of the World. It's all they ever really do. So the real issue here is -- Skolnick's certain percentage of exaggerations aside -- what is or is not true..?
- Pazouzou (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC).
Well, it's so bad that it's self-defeating. I doubt it would mislead anyone. His parents lost their meager life savings due to the corruption of crooked politicians and judges LOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.26.4 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- What a revolting comment. What happened to his parents is what put him on his life-time crusade. You -- you're just a garden-variety cynic. Who will have been of greater worth to Humanity in the end? Two guesses. First doesn't count.
Skolnick
Many of his conspiracy claims were unfounded in fact and outright ludicrous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.234.175.93 (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)