Talk:Sherman College of Chiropractic

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Chiropractic Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Discussion moved from user talk page

I do want to promote Sherman College in its role of supporting straight chiropractic philosophy as opposed to mixed chiropractic. I am still editing the article. Whyzz (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Whyzz[reply]

That's not what wikipedia is about. This article breaches WP:SOAP andy (talk) 23:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sherman College of Chiropractic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing COI tag

@Rayman60:, I see you placed a COI tag on this page back in August of this year. Just wondering your reasoning. The article doesn't seem to have any bias, POV, or slant to it, it is pretty short and while it perhaps needs better referencing seems to be easy to find online information. Who were you suspecting to have a COI with this article? Did you leave a post on their talk page asking if they could declare a COI if it's true? For now I'm removing the tag because I just don't see how it fits, but let me know if I'm mistaken! SEMMENDINGER (talk) 15:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]