Talk:Shenzhen Bay Control Point

(no title)

No chance of maps of these places i guess? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.79.137.58 (talk) 2009-02-01T09:48:24 (UTC)

What about the drawings in the enabling bill/ordinance for the HKPA? 1.64.48.231 (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

You can't upload copyrighted content to wikipedia. Matthew hk (talk) 07:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Even if those materials are eligible for copyrights they can still serve as the basis for illustrations. 1.64.48.231 (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

If anyone find the vandalism from SchmuckyTheCat, just revert it as soon as possible. Martinoei (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

With pleasure, indeed. We cannot let this user spread ultra-Chinese-nationalist POV on Wikipedia. Douglas the Comeback Kid (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Scope

Should this entry be renamed with its scope expanded to cover the entire "Hong Kong Port Area", which includes not only the half of that building and the adjacent open area housing the immigration and customs facilities but also the part of the bridge over the Chinese third of Deep Bay? 1.64.48.231 (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

There is no content to split at all. wikipedia is not a travel guide so that those citation boom has nothing merit to worth as a separate content as Shenzhen Bay Port Hong Kong Port Area by undone the merge / split the content from Shenzhen Bay Port. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. There are a pair of articles for other port of Hong Kong-Shenzhen, but Shenzhen Bay Port is basically the same building as juxtaposed controls. Matthew hk (talk) 07:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Based on what you said above you don't seem to have any idea about the enabling bill, the controversies back then, etc., or the layout of the "HK Port Area". 1.64.48.231 (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Shenzhen Bay Port article has only 14,801 bytes in size and you really need to prove the HK port area alone is W:GNG notable. the controversy of 一地兩檢 should has its own standalone article instead, which involved protest and other events. Matthew hk (talk) 14:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

I'd doubt if there were any significant protests against the bill for the co-location arrangement of this control point. Meanwhile your way of presentation of including Chinese characters with no translation in parentheses and your unfamiliarity across so many subject matters concerning the territory have made it difficult to believe you are having sufficient life experience in this territory. That in turn has made the reliability of your remarks and content input questionable. For information, the controversies weren't just about the core issues around co-location arrangement, but also the extension of the general jurisdiction of Hong Kong's courts beyond the borders of Hong Kong for all areas of law, the validity and the legal effect of insurance policies and other private contracts and agreements in the "HKPA", and so on and so forth. Before you comment further it would be much helpful if you could get yourself sufficiently familiarised in the relevant matters. 1.64.48.231 (talk) 16:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

So the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (the main bridge) need to split as well? Shenzhen Bay Port is basically a big single complex that actually outside Hong Kong border, unlike Shenzhen railway station and Lo Wu railway station that in-between there are open space (shopping mall) and they are two separate buildings. I said again wikipedia is not a travel guide. You can seek more people to comment this thread in RfC (or somewhere like WP:Teahouse), but you really need to list the outline you want to prove to the Hong Kong port area is passing WP:GNG alone (probably WP:NBUILDING as well) with WP:RS. Matthew hk (talk) 05:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)