Talk:Shemale/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Shemale. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Shemale porn redirect discusion
There is a redirect discussion for Shemale porn. Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 October 23#Shemale porn. You can add your opinion over there. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shemale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726022351/http://www.glaad.org/reference/defamatory to http://www.glaad.org/reference/defamatory
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Image
An article this size should have one; there's a few on commons (which are only redirects from shemale, obviously). O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 08:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Not every article needs an image, and adding one to this article can be tricky, given the controversial nature of the topic, especially if the image were to look like a porn image. I see the options on commons. This image used to be in the Connotations section of the article, and I'd be okay with adding that image or a similar one. Per WP:GRATUITOUS, I don't think that a porn or very graphic image is the way to go. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Naïve Use by Non-LGBTQ Persons
Although I am of course aware of its patronising, derogatory, and offensive connotations, and that the dogged insistence on its use by the wilfully ignorant is simply grossly insensitive. Nevertheless, the term can be, has been, and is still being used by persons either outside the LGBTQ demographic; or by, for example, straight-identifying bisexual men in blithe innocence of the correct terms in current use.