Talk:Sheldon Manor/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (no original research):
- It is broad in its coverage
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- Low volume of edit activity; no edit wars apparent.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (copyright tagged and captioned): b (appropriate use; lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
This is a nice little article. Thank you for nominating it as a GA. I've brought up a few points for you to look at, and so place the review on hold. The article is generally sound. –Whitehorse1 22:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Well written requirement
[edit]- "It and its owners were described by the New York Times as "... provid[ing] [ingredient] so many historic buildings lack" This is slightly awkward, referring to the inanimate building and people together.
- Done now matches the cited article.
- "and from 1917 it was owned by the Gibbs family" Maybe 'has been owned'? (Or rewritten in active voice.)
- This isn't clear, because Mrs Gibbs moved out in 1992, and the present occupants are called Hawkins but I'm not sure if they've bought it or are tenanting.
- Ah, okay. Given that, the current phrasing seems best.
- This isn't clear, because Mrs Gibbs moved out in 1992, and the present occupants are called Hawkins but I'm not sure if they've bought it or are tenanting.
- The 2nd paragraph of the "History" section has a slight proseline feel. You can probably improve it by punctuation, spacing or other small adjustments.
Done Have broken this up into smaller sections roughly based on historical periods.
- Is it worth wikilinking AA/NPI?
- AA is the The Automobile Association, but I can't find out which of the many NPIs it could be.
- "Modern times" section: "It hosts summer productions of Shakespeare and operas in its grounds and is a licensed venue for weddings." The part about Sheldon Manor being a weddings venue is slightly confusing as only the grounds are open, and the house is inhabited.
- Done rejigged this to avoid the ambiguity. It seems from one website that although the house is not generally open, rooms may be used for weddings, and I don't want to overstate this without checking with the local authority.
Broadness, Referencing
[edit]- The "Antiques" section is small—yet proud! Is any further information available such as famous artefacts or works by well-known artists, etc?
- Done, found on the NY Times article, but unfortunately can't determine which of the three Teniers' it is, so have left it unlinked. I'll look into that.
- Please check you have all web references properly formatted with publishers and access dates at the very least—I think 99% already are.
- Done All look OK now, have attributed author for NYTimes article.
- Are you able to clarify if there's one self-published Gibbs book or multiple titles? The Worldcat database is unclear, listing three possibly duplicate titles: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/number at numbers: 60674211, 78393569, and 220203069.
- It would seem to be "(1983). Sheldon Manor: a history of the house and the manor. Cornwall, s.n.", which is the 78393569; the title matches information I've received from the Hawkins, but we don't need to cite it, although an isbn would help.
- Agreed on the citing point. The search results made me wonder if Mrs Gibbs had written more than one book on the manor; the variations might be due to some sources including a subtitle, etc. The reported page counts (Worldcat, Amazon.com seller) varied too, though it's probably not worth reading much into that variance. For single self-published books, a private individual can obtain an ISBN, though as far as I know it's not a norm. In this case, I didn't find one; if anyone discovers one in the future, it can easily be added.
- Is it worth mentioning/clarifying its 'Chippenham Without' / 'Chippenham Within' location mentioned at the Wiltshire County Council site you linked?
- Done
Images
[edit]- On the first image you've added licensing information: "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License" ... No it's not. :) Please adjust to match the license at the source link.
- Done
- Are there any historic images available? Perhaps an idea for future further improvement.
- Some historic maps are at the country council site you have linked, though I don't know if these would genuinely add something to the article.
- Doing... Have added the parish map to show location. Unable to find historic images of the Manor itself, but will take a look.
Final comments
[edit]Thank you for your prompt attentiveness during the review, Rodhullandemu. Your expansions and improvements strengthened the article beyond its already decent standard. You've indicated you've some thoughts & ideas, and things in motion, for future changes, which is great.
As it stands, I believe the article does now meet the GA assessment criteria. On that basis, I am pleased therefore to pass Sheldon Manor as a Good Article. –Whitehorse1 18:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Much obliged for your advice and input. Makes a good day even better. --Rodhullandemu 19:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)