Talk:Sheira & Loli's Dittydoodle Works

Speedy Deletion?

While I don't think the article should be deleted, it might be worthwhile to re-work the article to make it more neutral.--Paul McDonald 02:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

I will re-work this to make it more neutral. It' my first wikipedia page so I was very hung-up on formating, licensing, etc (which I obviously didn't get quite correct) again, thanks for the help, most appreciated!!! I will make some improvements and hopefully not be ousted from the Wikicommunity. .--Abby Koenig

Much better

To me, this looks much better! Anyone else?--Paul McDonald 04:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SL Hug thumb.jpg

Image:SL Hug thumb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dittycast.jpg

Image:Dittycast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I searched everywhere, including Billboard's web site, for info about the "National Songwriter's Award" statement; all I could find were press releases, so I had to remove it. If anyone can source it, by all means add it back; I just couldn't find any reference to the award anywhere.

Also, does anyone have a source for the "taped segments with live children"? In Chicago broadcasts, there's nothing of the sort, but I know different affiliates do things differently. Gladys J Cortez 04:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a nationally-distributed program, I would think if the show had live-action segments, similar to "Arthur", it would be seen on all stations, not a selected few. -- azumanga (talk) 17:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about this statement:

"The characters' diverse personalities are designed to provide opportunities to teach positive emotional, social, and educational lessons as young viewers learn, along with the characters, about self-esteem, cooperation, relationships, fitness, and concepts about nature, the physical world, and literacy."

It sounds a lot like advertising to me, but I can't just delete this either. Is there any way to make this sound more encyclopedic? Brittany Ka (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]