Talk:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Carabinieri (talk · contribs) 02:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Ominictionary, you've indicated on your user page that you're retired. Does this mean you'll be unable to address issues during this review? Is anyone else willing to jump in?--Carabinieri (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it in case User:Ominictionary does not.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll get started on the review and post my first comments in the next couple of days.--Carabinieri (talk) 06:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Vinegarymass911, here are someinitial comments.

The article really needs some copyediting. There are grammatical issues. Some parts assume knowledge of South Asian history most readers won't have. Some of the prose is just hard to understand.
The article mixes different referencing styles. There also issues some of the footnotes. Here are some examples:
- Footnote 3 is a YouTube video.
- Footnote 8 only gives "99—" as the page range.
- Footnote 12 needs a page number.
- Footnote 17: unclear what this refers to. Is this a book?
- Footnote 22: also needs a page number.

Are these things you can work on?--Carabinieri (talk) 21:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC) In light of Omnidictionary's retirement, I'm afraid it won't be possible at this time to bring the article up to GA standard, so I'm going to close the nomination.--Carabinieri (talk) 03:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]