Talk:SheepShaver

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newer builds

I believe that there are newer, more stable, and more usable builds available. The Emaculation forums include information on them. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 13:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy run-on sentence

I'm not entirely sure what this sentence means - could someone rewrite it so it makes sense? It comes from the last paragraph of the current version. It has numerous grammatical, capitalization, and readability errors (and uses multiple spellings of "Mac OS X" as well).

" In the Time while Linux distro's like YDL are made, some developers compiled the source code of the SheepShaver to port it to the PowerPC architecture,then the memory management unit are enabled, because the software in this stage will not translate the binaries or emulate the PowerPC ,then SheepShaver are able to run some MacOSX ,like Mac OS X v10.0, Mac OS X Public Beta ,and Mac OS X Server 1.0 it. as is the case with Basilisk II, and thus cannot run later versions of Mac OS 9 or any version of Mac OS X, which is best emulated by PearPC " —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.127.173.233 (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Independent sources needed

Surely this has been covered. Help! Couldn't find any non-forum non-blog non-press-release writeups yet. --Lexein (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New version number

They haven't made a release of it yet but a few months back in the development repo the version number has been bumped to 2.4. Maybe the page should say "preview version: 2.4" or "unstable version: 2.4" or something like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.120.78 (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SheepShaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/en/projects/sheepshaver
Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/en/projects/sheepshaver

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Citation" needed

Not sure why the existence of a Windows build needs a citation, but if someone wants to add it, here you go: https://www.emaculation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5325&sid=7ab5186fb94dc729592579283b37dcc8 107.5.170.33 (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion?

Recently, a related software page - Basilisk_II - has been marked for proposed deletion because it lacks significant coverage by reliable sources. In particular, its only references are a Github source code repository, a wiki, and the official page for the software (a non-independent source).

In comparing the sources for this article, I found it also only features sources which are specifically called out as unreliable sources (wikis, official homepages, and personal blogs) that do not qualify an article for notability and hence inclusion in Wikipedia.

User:Woodroar and others - in your opinions, would this article also be a candidate for deletion based on the official notability guidelines?

Velocitay (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]