Talk:Shea & Gould

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why did Shea & Gould go under?

The article states that Shea & Gould "dissolved" . . . . but then says nothing more . . . nothing, zip, nada. Why did it go under? Did it go bankrupt? Did it leave debts behind? There has to be a reason why this firm went under. Did partners get any of their equity back? Did they end up getting nothing and then further having to pay off the firm's debts? This is a strange article that leaves a lot of unanswered questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betathetapi545 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to those who added additional information, even if it later got deleted - I ended up reading the edits and deletions since I posted the above comment and now know more or less why Shea & Gould went under - the merger with that Los Angeles firm apparently was a disaster, and then once you have lawyers leave combined with declining revenue, that is a classic recipe for a lawfirm to go under. I'm still curious if all bills/debts got paid, and if the partners got any of their equity out, and if so, what percentage. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betathetapi545 (talk • contribs) 11:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]